Legal Opinion

Mechay v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1961No. Docket 56, Calendar 48,557PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Plaintiff, under contract with defendant city of Detroit, was painting the top of a street light pole when the pole broke, throwing him to the ground. His amended declaration for damages was dismissed on motion and this appeal was taken to review that dismissal.

Plaintiff’s amended declaration contains 3 counts. He alleged, in the first, common-law negligence; in the second, breach of a statutory duty; and in the-third, breach of the common-law duty to maintain a. safe place to work. No claims are made in this appeal by plaintiff with reference to dismissal of his-first or third counts.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cabana v. City of HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Rufner v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Beaudin v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Michonski v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Roux v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Ovist v. Department of State Highways & TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API