Salisbury v. Binghamton Pub. Co.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Onondaga county. Action by Celia Salisbury and others, as administrators, against the Binghamton Publishing Company. From an order granting a discontinuance, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
Although the appeal book before us does not contain the complaint, answer, or the report of the referee upon which the interlocutory judgment was entered, we discover from the appeal papers before us that an action was brought by the plaintiffs’ intestate, as a creditor of the Binghamton Hydraulic Power Company, against the stockholders of said company. A preliminary injunction was obtained, and that was sustained. The action seems *653to have been commenced and conducted upon the principles laid down in Pfohl v. Simpson, 74 N. Y. 137. After the issues were joined, there was a reference to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Innes v. LansingNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Matter of Petition of ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pfohl v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Carleton v. . DarcyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Salisbury v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1895