Legal Opinion · Dissent

Everard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-0552Published

1DissentGlickstein, Judge

The facts in this matter include the following: Detective O’Neil set up surveillance of Everard’s home. Detective O’Neil positioned himself across the street about thirty-five to forty feet from Everard’s sliding glass door. O’Neil testified that he saw a hand unlock the door and someone look through the drapes (later identified as Everard.) O’Neil testified that he saw Ev-erard pull the drapes aside, that Everard was clad only in white briefs, and that he was fondling himself. O’Neil testified that he could see all of this with his plain eyes, but he did use either binoculars or a zoom lens…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chu v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Rice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Drigotas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API