United States v. Chandler
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This motion contains a request under Rule 16, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 687, to inspect and copy or photostat 20 writings of an assorted nature. The government attorneys have agreed with counsel for the defendant to furnish them with most of the documents and records which they actually have in their possession and the controversy at present involves items 14: “All typewritten statements prepared by the defendant and delivered to any member or representative of the United States Government”; 17: “A statement prepared by the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Harold L. Peek, Jr., and Susanna E. Peek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- State v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.