Legal Opinion

Marraccini v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1101In an action, inter alia, to recover in quantum meruit, the defendants John Ryan and Pam Ryan appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBella, J.), entered August 24, 2009, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3015 (e) and 3211 (a) (7) insofar as asserted against them, and to vacate a mechanic’s lien and cancel the notice of pendency filed against their property, and as granted the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. George Piersa, Inc. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Scofield v. DeGroodtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Flax v. HommelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Callos, Inc. v. JulianelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Pepe v. TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marraccini v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Carrea & Sons, Inc. v. HemmerdingerRye City Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API