Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Phh Mortgage Services

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 14, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-3820Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CAROLYN BULLOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-03820 (TSC) ) ) PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Carloyn Bullock, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), “brings this action solely in her authorized representative capacity as Trustee of the Bullock-Browner El Family Living Trust[,]” and “not in her individual capacity.” Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”), ECF No. 6, at 1. She sues PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), id,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API