Legal Opinion

Grayson v. Veeche

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the court of the first district.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This is a suit by attachment, in which *689the plaintiff caused the amount of a judgment lately recovered against himself, by the present defendant, to he attached.

East'n District. Feb. 1823.

The latter obtained a dissolution of the attachment, the district court being of opinion “that no attachment can be sued out by a person, indebted to another, for an alleged debt, duo him, attaching a debt due by himself in his own hands, and making himself a garnishee.” The plaintiff appealed.

According to our act of assembly. effects or credits (effects ou creances) of absent debtors may be attached, 1…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Findlay v. Hinde & WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fleitas v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pandelly v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836
  3. Jacobs v. BogartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  4. Bierra v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1823
  5. Garidel v. FogliardiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1826

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API