Legal Opinion

Berg v. Poeppel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1935No. 25380. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The amended complaint of respondent, in substance, alleges: That, prior to February 15, 1933, one Frank E. Berg constructed a dwelling house for appellants, upon completion of which a dispute arose of the amount due Berg; that, on February 15, 1933, it was orally agreed that Berg accept in full settlement the sum of $471, with interest at seven per cent, payable at the rate of fifteen dollars per month, commencing- March 15, 1933, and that such' agreement was evidenced by a promissory note which was secured by a second mortgage; that the note and mortgage were executed to Berg, and that, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clute v. SmallNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Vogle v. RipperIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Wallace v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Woodworth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. N. S. Hoon v. Harmer Steel Products & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. N. S. Hoon v. Harmer Steel Products And Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API