Legal Opinion

People v. Lightstone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1951No. Docket 76, Calendar 44,251PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiishnelu, J.

Upon leave granted, the people •have appealed from an order of the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit, quashing an information against defendants Richard Lightstone, Philip Jones and Bill Roberts. Upon stipulation of the parties the appeal was dismissed as to defendant Jones, Without prejudice. to the appellant and remaining appellees.

The information is laid under section 305 of the penal code (CL 1948, § 750.305 [Stat Ann § 28.537]), which reads:.. “Any person, or his agent or employee who shall, directly or-indirectly, by means of any newspaper, periodical, poster, notice or other mode…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. MakiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Parkes v. Judge of Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. WesterbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SamuelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. State v. StraughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. People v. BenjaminMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Leach v. Racing CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. MercerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API