Legal Opinion

Hortense Smithson and Mark Smithson v. Frank Cid

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 29, 2011No. 13-10-00062-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER 13-10-00062-CV HORTENSE SMITHSON AND MARK SMITHSON, Appellants, v. FRANK CID, Appellee. NUMBER 13-10-00095-CV HORTENSE SMITHSON AND MARK SMITHSON, Appellants, v. FGAP INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND FRANZ MENARDY, Appellees. On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes These are interlocutory, accelerated appeals from the trial court‘s orders granting the special appearances of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API