Legal Opinion
Dehning v. Eads
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided October 18, 1972No. 55234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDSON, Justice.
This original certiorari proceeding presents a single issue: Must plaintiff, contesting suspension of his driving privileges, exhaust the administrative remedy provided by § 321.211, The Code (administrative hearing) before appealing to district court under § 321.215, The Code? We agree with trial court’s determination the administrative hearing is a prerequisite to a § 321.215 court appeal, and annul the writ.
I. Plaintiff was convicted of a speeding violation. The Iowa Department of Public Safety then suspended his operator’s license under § 321.210(7), The Code (serious…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sterling Drug Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Danner v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Elk Run Telephone Co. v. General Telephone Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson-Sinclair Company v. GriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Lakota Consolidated Independent School v. Buffalo Center/Rake Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Matters v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Anderson v. Iowa Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019