Legal Opinion

Hughes v. McDougle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Action by the appellants against the appellees, ITenry McDougle and James and Joseph De Armond, upon several promissory notes made by the defendants as partners, under the name of McDougle, De Armond & Go., to the plaintiffs. The notes sued upon range, in date, from May 30 to September 10, 1860, and amount to $3H.0S.

*400Issue; trial by the Court, and finding and judgment for the plaintiffs, for $90.15.

The plaintiffs appeal. The question presented arises upon the special finding of the Court, in connection with the evidence upon which the finding was based. It is objected that all the evidence can…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doggett v. DillIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ross-Higgins Co. v. RookWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Continental Gin Co. v. StockerDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Kendallville Lumber Co. v. BurgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API