Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided April 8, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Allen Gordon State Senator 105 South Moose Morrilton, Arkansas 72110

Dear Senator Gordon:

This is in response to your request for an opinion regarding the county's obligation to furnish a court reporter for juvenile hearings. You have asked, specifically, whether this office has interpreted Act 14 of 1987 to require a court reporter and whether the county which funds juvenile matters is required to provide such service. You have also asked what, if any, action could be taken to force payment to a reporter.

The only guidance offered in Act 14 with respect to the county's obligation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Venhaus v. State ex rel. LoftonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Sebastian Bridge Dist. v. Lynch, Chancery ClerkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Ex parte TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API