Dahl v. Ellis
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The first issue presented on this appeal is what duty, if any, this pedestrian, walking on a highway in the left-hand lane, had of lookout to his rear.
Appellant contends that a pedestrian walking in the left-hand side of the road as sanctioned by statute has no duty to maintain a lookout to the rear.
In Mewhorter v. Integrity Mut. Casualty Co.1 our court discussed the specific problem, pertinent here, of *445whether a pedestrian on a highway in his proper lane owes a duty of lookout to the rear. The court said that failure to maintain such a lookout was not negligence as a matter of law. On the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mewhorter v. Integrity Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957