Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Ellis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1967Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first issue presented on this appeal is what duty, if any, this pedestrian, walking on a highway in the left-hand lane, had of lookout to his rear.

Appellant contends that a pedestrian walking in the left-hand side of the road as sanctioned by statute has no duty to maintain a lookout to the rear.

In Mewhorter v. Integrity Mut. Casualty Co.1 our court discussed the specific problem, pertinent here, of *445whether a pedestrian on a highway in his proper lane owes a duty of lookout to the rear. The court said that failure to maintain such a lookout was not negligence as a matter of law. On the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mewhorter v. Integrity Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API