Legal Opinion
Carlson v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (In re Carlson)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 17, 2014No. BAP Nos. 14-6013, 14-6024PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEDERMAN, Chief Judge.
Debtors Stephen Wayne Carlson and Victoria Leah Carlson appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s Order1 denying their *757Motion for Violation of Automatic Stay, Violation of Homestead Exemption, Violation of Discharge and Creditor Misconduct. They also appeal from the Order dismissing their case and imposing a 180-day bar for refiling. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.
The Debtors filed a pro se Chapter 13 bankruptcy case on January 17, 2014. One of the reasons they filed the ease was to stop a pending foreclosure of their residential unit at the Gallery Tower Condominiums.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Long and Wife v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Soost v. NAH, Inc. (In Re Soost)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Marshall v. McCarty (In Re Marshall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bergman v. Webb (In Re Webb)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri v. Spencer (In re Spencer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Situm v. Coppess (In re Coppess)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- State of Missouri v. Michael E. SpencerUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Zeljko Situm v. Douglass J. CoppessUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017