Legal Opinion
Vienneau v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 13, 1989No. 88-0327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESQUIROZ, MARGARITA, Associate Judge.
Raoul Vienneau alleged in his complaint against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company that he was employed for over eighteen years by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of Canada, a subsidiary or affiliated company legally distinct and wholly independent from the defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “Metropolitan”). Vienneau alleged that Metropolitan solicited him to move from Canada and accept temporary employment at Metropolitan’s South Florida office in Hollywood. Vienneau attached as an exhibit to his complaint a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Blackhawk Heat. & P. Co., Inc. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Friedman v. Virginia Metal Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Peacock Const. Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Muller v. Stromberg Carlson Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Jaar v. University of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prestige Rent-A-Car v. ADVANTAGE CARDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Vienneau v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Bryan v. Braun Cadillac, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Dhsh Corp. v. Affordable EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999