Legal Opinion
McGlone v. Port Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*480Although defendants did not timely comply with prior court-ordered deadlines, the record supports the motion court’s determination that they substantially complied with their disclosure obligations and that any failure to comply was not wilful, contumacious or in bad faith (see Perez v New York City Tr. Auth., 73 AD3d 529, 530 [2010]; Banner v New York City Hous. Auth., 73 AD3d 502, 503 [2010]).
The court also properly directed plaintiff to provide authorizations for all medical records unrestricted by date as sought by defendants in prior discovery requests. Plaintiff averred in his bill of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rega v. Avon Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Banner v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Noble v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Perez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Trillium USAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Colwin v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Frawley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Rom v. Eurostruct, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Joseph v. EdunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.