Legal Opinion
Grant S. Lyddon v. Geothermal Properties, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1993No. 92-55466PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Grant S. Lyddon contests the district court’s award of $54,728.05 in attorney’s fees, double costs, and related damages to Geothermal Properties, Inc. (GPI). This award was made pursuant to this court’s order imposing Fed.R.App.Pro. 38 sanctions. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the reasons stated below we reverse the district court’s award and impose sanctions in the amount of $26,493.40.
BACKGROUND
This protracted litigation began on June 22, 1989, when Lyddon sued GPI alleging that the company had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Matthew Lockary v. Paul Kayfetz Victor Amoroso Mary Lowry Diana Lopez Fransworth Frederick B. McClellan Peter Warshall v. Pacific Legal FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- State Industries, Inc. v. Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. And American Appliance Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. KayfetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walker v. City of BogalusaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Timothy Blixseth v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Berg v. Good Samaritan Hospital (In Re Berg)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Someone Claiming to Represent Oil & Gas Company v. Harold T. Duryee, Successor in Interest to George Fabe, as the State of Ohio LiquidatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Dixon v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.