Legal Opinion

Betz v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 27, 1942No. 15,116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Plaintiff in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as claimant, sought compensation for herself and minor son for the loss of her husband, Raymond Betz, who died some hours after collapsing while unloading pea vines from a truck on the premises of the Kuner Empson Company, one of the defendants in error, hereinafter designated as the company. The Industrial Commission found that claimant’s husband was not an employee of the company, and that he did not sustain injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. In an appropriate legal action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Industrial Commission v. FunkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Industrial Commission v. SantarelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffreys-Mcelrath Mfg. Co. v. HuietSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Industrial Commission v. BetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Doyle v. Missouri Valley Constructors, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1968
  4. Jeffreys-McElrath Manufacturing Co. v. HuietSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API