Legal Opinion · Dissent

Felix Martinez v. George Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1989No. 87-1534Published

1DissentSeymour, Circuit Judge

Although I agree with the majority in all other respects, I respectfully dissent from its view that the prosecution acted in good faith in attempting to secure the presence of witness Sam Love, and that Love was “unavailable.” I am convinced that Felix Martinez was impermissibly deprived of his Sixth Amendment confrontation right, and I would grant his habeas petition contingent upon the State of New Mexico’s decision to conduct a new trial.

My concern about the majority’s treatment of the unavailability issue is twofold. First, its presentation of the facts does not include record evidence…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API