Felix Martinez v. George Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentSeymour, Circuit Judge
Although I agree with the majority in all other respects, I respectfully dissent from its view that the prosecution acted in good faith in attempting to secure the presence of witness Sam Love, and that Love was “unavailable.” I am convinced that Felix Martinez was impermissibly deprived of his Sixth Amendment confrontation right, and I would grant his habeas petition contingent upon the State of New Mexico’s decision to conduct a new trial.
My concern about the majority’s treatment of the unavailability issue is twofold. First, its presentation of the facts does not include record evidence…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.