Legal Opinion
United States v. Vance Inouye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2016No. 14-10510PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Defendant Vance Yukio Inouye appeals from an order setting a restitution schedule in connection with the revocation of his supervised release. We affirm.
I. FACTS
Inouye pleaded guilty to a count of wire fraud and a count of conspiracy, in connection with a fraudulent mortgage scheme he helped perpetuate. The district court sentenced him to one month in prison, followed by three- and five-year terms of supervised release, to be served concurrently. The district court also ordered Inouye to be jointly and severally liable for $274,401 in restitution — $74,401 to a victim family and the…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ward v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Luis NunezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- In re: Western Funding Incorporated Western Funding Inc. of Nevada Global Track Gps, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jack HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Duranleau v. EilerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.