Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1964No. 36890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile while his Texas license as a commercial operator was suspended; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $250.

Our attention is directed to the fact that the recognizance appearing in the record is shown to have been entered into by the appellant and only one surety. Art. 831 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., which prescribes the form of a misdemeanor recognizance on appeal, provides that the recognizance be entered into by the defendant and two sureties.

The recognizance, not being in substantial compliance with the statute, is insufficient…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goolsby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Hatfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Lunsford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eads v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. State v. RothSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. State v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API