Grobe v. Three Village Herald
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Gulotta, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and vote to reverse the order and deny defendants’ motion.
Contrary to the views expressed by my brethren in the majority, it is my belief that there exists in this case a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants acted in a "grossly irresponsible manner” (see Chapadeau v Utica Observer-Dispatch, 38 NY2d 196, 199) in researching, preparing and publishing the allegedly libelous article, and that therefore the motion for summary judgment should have been denied. Accordingly, I would reverse and remit the case for a plenary trial.
In order for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.