Legal Opinion

B. Altman & Co. v. City of White Plains

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The valuation of assessed property is essentially a question of fact (Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 510). Accordingly, where, as here, the determinations of value made at nisi prius have been affirmed at the Appellate Division, those valuations must be upheld unless there has been an error of law in the use of an erroneous theory of valuation *906or unless the record does not contain evidence to support them (Matter of Seagram & Sons v Tax Comm. of City of N. Y., 14 NY2d 314, 317).

There is record…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Adcor Realty Corp. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Commission of Taxation & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Commission of Taxation & AssessmentNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. County Dollar Corp. v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API