United States v. David Durant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the important issue of the proper standard for appointment of a defense expert under the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 552 (1964), as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (1970). David Durant appeals from a judgment of conviction for armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York after a jury trial before Mark A. Costantino, J. The only claim on appeal is that the district court’s failure to grant a defense request for appointment of a fingerprint expert was error. We hold that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Harry William TheriaultCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Charles Anthony HartfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ben Thie SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Luther James Bradford v. United States of America, Johnny Paul Washam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Robert Theodore BassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.