Legal Opinion
People v. Newhauser
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided October 14, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Ramsgate, M.
The defendant moved to dismiss the information in the instant case on the ground that subdivision f of section 435-16.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York which he is alleged to have violated is invalid and unconstitutional.
The information under attack alleges:
“ * * * George Newhauser (now here) did wilfully and unlawfully violate the provisions of Section 435-16.0, subd. f of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, committed in a manner described as follows:
“ Deponent now states that at the above time and place, he observed the defendant, in the course of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Maurer v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Village of Carthage v. . FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- New Orleans Water Works Co. v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SantorielloCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999