Guerrieri v. Maxwell

In this action, petitioner is attacking the validity of the parole revocation procedure. His basic contention is that the same rights of due process append to the revocation of a parole as exist in relation to the original conviction. The same questions raised by petitioner were raised and thoroughly considered in In re Varner, 166 Ohio St. 340, and found not reviewable in habeas corpus.

Petitioner had a hearing before the parole board when he was returned to the penitentiary. He raises a question as to the validity of this hearing because it was before two members of the board instead of the…