Legal Opinion

Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 6, 2001No. CIV. A. 98-927 SSHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

This case involves three groups: plaintiff Baker Norton, defendants Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and two government officials (collectively “the FDA defendants”), and defendant-intervenor Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”). Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment, submitted by each of the three groups. The Court held a hearing on these motions. Upon careful consideration of the entire record, the Court concludes that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that judgment should be entered in favor of defendants and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Depomed, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. United States ex rel. Ryan v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Neurelis Inc. v. CaliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Sandoz Inc. v. CochranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API