Legal Opinion

Rainey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1995No. A94A2104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Anthony Lee Rainey was convicted of rape, OCGA § 16-6-1, and possession of cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-30. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.

1. Rainey contends the trial court erred in failing to charge on the law of circumstantial evidence under OCGA § 24-4-6. That Code section provides: “[t]o warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts shall not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but shall exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.” The rule established in Robinson v. State, 261 Ga. 698 (410…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Paradise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Attaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Rainey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API