Sherman v. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Minnehaha county court. Hon. W. A. Wilkes, Judge. Action for commissions by P. F. Sherman and others, co-partners, against the Port Huron Engine & Thresher Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.
A judgment for plaintiffs in this action was reversed on a former appeal. 8 S. D. 343, 66 N. W. 1077. Plaintiffs allege in their amended complaint for a first cause of action, that they were employed by defendant to procure purchasers of threshihg machines; that they procured a purchaser in the person of ,Frank Bates, who was ready, able, and willing to purchase a threshing outfit, and from whom they procured an order for such outfit, in conformity with their contract and employment; that defendant wrongfully and without cause refused to fill such order; that had such order been filled, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Saint Nicholas Bank v. State National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Tanderup v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Plymouth County Bank v. GilmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elliott v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Waterhouse v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Fanset v. Garden City State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- First Nat. Bank v. CalkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.