Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carr v. Quigley

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1889No. 9531Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new-trial. The action was commenced December 29, 1877, by W. B. Carr against John Quigley, to recover certain land in Alameda County, which the plaintiff claimed as grantee under a patent issued to the Central Pacific Railroad Company February 28, 1874. This patent was in confirmation of the grant of lands made by the acts of July 1, 1862, and July 2, 1864, to the Western Pacific…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new-trial. The action was commenced December 29, 1877, by W. B. Carr against John Quigley, to recover certain land in Alameda County, which the plaintiff claimed as grantee under a patent issued to the Central Pacific Railroad Company February 28, 1874. This patent was in confirmation of the grant of lands made by the acts of July 1, 1862, and July 2, 1864, to the Western Pacific Railroad Company, the predecessor in interest of the Central Pacific Railroad Company, and recites the exception of lands…

1ConcurrenceBeatty, C. J.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance upon the sole ground that what is here decided has become, by virtue of the decision on the former appeal (57 Cal. 394), so far as this court is concerned, the law of the case.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carr v. QuigleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API