Legal Opinion

Hippodrome Amusement Co. v. Carius

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1917PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

The appellee, Catherine Carius, brought this action in the Campbell circuit court against the appellant, The Hippodrome Amusement Company, and the city of Newport, and alleged for her cause of action that on the 9th day of August, and for several months immediately prior thereto, the appellant and the city of Newport maintained a water service box, in the sidewalk of Monmouth street, about nine inches from the curb line and immediately fronting the property of the appellant; that this water service box consisted of an iron pipe, about three feet long…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Baustian v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Reedy v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Norton v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Newport v. SchmitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Major v. FraserNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Chambers v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API