Legal Opinion

Bosler v. Rahn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1959No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The Burgess and the Council of the Borough of Norristown are at sixes and sevens over controlling the hours of duty of the police force in the town. The Burgess contends that since he is charged with responsibility for maintaining law and order, his command in this respect may not be challenged. The Council, on the other hand, maintains that since it appoints the policemen and bears the responsibility of providing for their compensation, it has exclusive authority to decide the hours of their employment. There is some merit in both positions, and it would appear…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salopek v. AlbertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Hoffman v. Borough of MacungieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Bell v. FloodCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Bosler AppealMontgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1959
  5. Somber v. Fabian, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API