Legal Opinion
Barbarisi v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF PATERSON
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 23, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 11 (1954)
103 A.2d 164
ANTHONY BARBARISI, ALFONSO MOSCHETTI, CARMELA LEPORE AND ROSE DE GISE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, WILLIAM BYRNES, INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS, LESTER F. TITUS, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, AND JOSEPH VIGNALI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 1, 1954.
Decided February 23, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Salvatore D. Viviano argued the cause for the appellants.
Mr. Joseph J. De Luccia argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. James D. Ward, attorney…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Devito v. PearsallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Berdan v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heagen v. Borough of AllendaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Inhabitants of Town of Windham v. SpragueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- North Plainfield v. PeroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Izenberg v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Poulathas v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.