Legal Opinion

Harden v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1940No. 29544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from his conviction in a bastardy proceeding. Defendant makes four contentions.

1. The first and third contentions maybe considered together. The complaint was filed before the birth of the child, and the case was tried after its birth. Defendant contends that the complaint should have been amended to show this fact. There was no motion made to require such amendment, and no objection to the proof of birth. Defendant demurred to the complaint, which demurrer was properly overruled. Under section 1718, O. S. 1931, 10 O.S.A. § 71, the complaint may be filed before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Hawk v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. State Ex Rel. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Benson v. State Ex Rel. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Buck v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Bnccorp v. HubCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API