Legal Opinion

Tilli v. Capobianco

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1983No. 345 Eastern District Allocation Docket, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The petition of Daniel Tilli for allowance of appeal is granted. Superior Court-Pa.Super.-, 461 A.2d 882, correctly affirmed Common Pleas’ dismissal of petitioner’s complaint against respondents, Donato Capobianco, Gus Milides, Martin Cohen, Kevin Kelleher, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Judge Freedberg, and its dismissal of petitioner’s motion for a default judgment against respondents Donato Capobianco and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. However, Common Pleas failed to set forth any findings to support the injunction it entered as follows:

[W]e perpetually enjoin and restrain…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. John Gordon v. U. S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Rudnicki v. McCormackDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  3. Boyle v. O'BANNONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riffin v. Circuit Court for Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API