Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1925No. 16500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

On March 2, 1925, at the regular March quarterly term of the city court of Dublin, the defendant’s motion for a new trial was filed. The rule nisi, without having the date of hearing inserted therein, was then signed by the court. “On or about the fifth or sixth of April, 1925,” the court set the hearing for April 11, 1925, by inserting that date in the rule nisi. On April 8, 1925, the court signed an order adjourning the March quarterly term of court. On April 11, 1925, the motion was dismissed, because a copy of it and of the rule nisi had not been served upon the solicitor, who had waived…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coulson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Garfield Oil Mills v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Shockley v. TurnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Broadway National Bank v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barkley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API