Legal Opinion

Fieldcrest Mills, Inc. v. Coble

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1976No. 67PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

The facts of the present case can be reduced to the following formula. “A,” a parent corporation, incorporates “B,” a wholly owned subsidiary, to perform a vital manufacturing service required by “A” corporation in its own production. “B” not only provides the service to “A” corporation, but 40% of its business is conducted with others. The two corporations operate as parent and subsidiary, filing separate state income tax returns as required by state law and consolidated income tax returns as permitted by federal law. After “B” experiences net operating losses for a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Newmarket Manufacturing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  4. Stanton Brewery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Koppers Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FarberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Richard's Auto City v. DIR., DIV. OF TAXNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Thermatool Corp. v. Department of Revenue ServicesConnecticut Superior Court · 1994
  5. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API