Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Divney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a suit by certain creditors of Mike Divney, deceased, on behalf of themselves and all other creditors, seeking judgments on debts contracted in his last illness for medical and hospital care. There was a recovery in favor of the complainants. The bill also sought' to set aside as fraudulent and void against creditors a conveyance of described real estate. The Chancellor rendered judgment for the claims sued on and decreed that the conveyance of the real estate to the son of Mike Divney was fraudulent, set the conveyance aside and ordered a sale of the property to satisfy the debts.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Carmack v. Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Price v. CuttsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kline v. EyrichTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Montcastle v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. Tennessee United Paint Store, Inc. v. D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  5. Emma Jean Anderson v. James Kenneth LowryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API