Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Village of Morenci

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Lenawee; Hart, 3. Bill by Leroy Sutton and another against the village of Morenci to set aside condemnation proceedings. From a decree for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife and own as tenants by entirety a farm of 60 acres, a portion of which, consisting of about 3.32 acres, lies within the corporate limits of the village of Morenci, Lena-wee county, adjacent to its so-called “Oak Grove” public cemetery. Owing to available space for burial being nearly exhausted in Oak Grove and a need for larger burial grounds in that community the village authorities desired and claimed it necessary to secure from plaintiffs this adjoining three and a fraction acre piece of land.

*92On August 13, 1917, the village council passed a resolution, with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. MoestaMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In re the appeals of PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People ex rel. Bingham v. Village of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Horton v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Glendale v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Colorado Central Power Co. v. City of EnglewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API