Legal Opinion

Artrip v. Peters

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1934No. 7617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

The plaintiff, Ada J. Artrip, being dissatisfied with her verdict and judgment for $49.74 in her suit against defendants, W. H. Peters, Nora B. Peters, makers, and Z. T. Peters, M. J. Peters and Tennie Peters, accommodation indorsers of a negotiable promissory note for $400.00, dated December 26, 1930, due in twelve months, obtained this writ of error.

The payee of the note is Lindsey Artrip, husband of plaintiff. He assigned the note to her prior to maturity. Before the ease was put on trial before the jury, the defendants pleaded usury and made a tender in court of $49.74…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eskridge v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kessel v. CohenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Miller v. Prudential Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Michigan National Bank v. MattinglyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hall v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Newcomb v. Niskey's Lake Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API