Legal Opinion

Cappadonna v. Illinois Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to answer.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The notice of motion seems to be framed as a motion under section 547 and also under section 976 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I shall treat it as under the latter section, it appearing to be the more appropriate to the relief demanded.

The action was brought by the plaintiff, suing in behalf of himself and all other creditors of Edward Mondaini doing business under the name andi style of E. Mondaini & Co., to recover on a bond given by the above named defendant in the penal sum of $15,000, pursuant to chapter 185 of the Laws of 1907, as amended by chapter 479 of the *471Laws of 1908. The answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guffanti v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Illinois Surety Co. v. MattoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. SemingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Piper-Howe Lumber Co. v. PadgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Coan v. Plaza Equity Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API