Legal Opinion

Middlebrooks v. State Bd. of Health

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 1998No. 1961079PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case presents the issue whether § 22-11A-2, Ala. Code 1975, which requires physicians, dentists, and certain other persons to report cases or suspected cases of "notifiable diseases" and health conditions, such as HIV infections and AIDS cases, to the Alabama State Board of Health, is discriminatory and therefore violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Dr. Mark Middlebrooks, a physician practicing in Jefferson County, specializes in infectious diseases. Through his practice, Dr. Middlebrooks diagnoses and treats patients…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. UNITED STATES of America v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Doe v. Borough of BarringtonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. McClendon v. Shelby CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte St. Vincent's Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  3. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  4. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  5. Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API