Legal Opinion

Appeal of Paducah & Illinois Railroad

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 26, 1925No. Docket No. 3028PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1005OPINION.

James:

The taxpayer alleges error on the part of the Commissioner, first, on the ground that the amounts above set forth were *1006contributed by the railroad companies as capital to the taxpayer and did not constitute income; and, second, that the taxpayer is a mere joint facility and agency of the railroad companies, and as such is not a separate entity which can be the receiver of income or taxable under the revenue laws. On the latter point we do not agree with the contention of the taxpayer, and must hold that it is a separate taxable entity, distinct from the railroad companies,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rensselaer & S. R. v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  3. Blalock v. Georgia Ry. & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Anderson v. Morris & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Hamilton v. Kentucky & I. Terminal R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. G.M. Trading Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. James Hotel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Concord Village, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Lake Forest, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. 874 Park Ave. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API