Legal Opinion

United States v. Vargas-Molina

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 26, 2019No. Case No. 19-cr-20067Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge

Defendant Leopoldo Vargas-Molina was indicted for unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He filed two motions to dismiss the indictment, both of which go to the validity of his underlying removal order from 2011. Vargas-Molina relies upon § 1326(d) to collaterally attack that order. And in his second, he argues that the Immigration Judge ("IJ") lacked jurisdiction to conduct the removal hearing, rendering the order of removal void ab initio . For the reasons set forth below, Vargas-Molina's 2011 removal order is invalid. His first motion to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API