Sutherland v. Ammann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Aureal by the plaintiff, Daniel W. 'Sutherland, from a judgment" of the Supreme Court in favor of .the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 29th day of. May, 1905, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the coiirt after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term.,
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligénce of *333the- defendant, and, having been nonsuited, is entitled to have the questions reviewed from the standpoint that all of the facts and inferences are such as the jury might properly have found from his evidence.
The complaint in the action is drawn upon the theory that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff because of a violation of the provisions of section 18 of chapter 415 of the Laws of 1897, known as the Labor Law; but the appeal is sought to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lewis v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Schapp v. . BloomerNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Welk v. Jackson Architectural Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caddy v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Williams v. First National Bank of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907