Legal Opinion

Williams v. Adams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 1994No. 93-647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Top Brands Marketing and Rupert Williams, its sole stockholder, appeal from the entry of a default. We find that the *192principal claim, that Williams did not receive notice of Adams’s application for a default, is meritorious.

Adams brought an action for equitable lien and quantum meruit against Williams and Top Brands Auto. Williams was served by summons and process at his residence. The corporation was served at its business address. Williams, personally, and the corporation were represented by an attorney. After settlement negotiations collapsed, the trial court entered an order directing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appliance & Refrigeration Distributors, Inc. v. Fedders Usa, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corso v. PadmanabhanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API