Legal Opinion

Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1917No. 13343Published

Motion to modify judgment for costs, filed in the supreme court September 5, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Modify.

Per Curiam. —

By the original opinion of this department in this case (92 Wash. 419, 159 Pac. 369), the case was re*324manded for a new trial on account of error by the trial judge. It was then shown that the error was in part the fault of appellant. Costs of appeal were allowed appellant as for a complete reversal. This was inadvertent. Respondent has moved for modification, either to allow respondent costs of appeal, or to order that such costs abide the result of the action.

Costs cannot be awarded to the respondent under .the statute because it is not the “prevailing party” on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bankson v. LaflamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API