Legal Opinion
In Re Miller
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided January 24, 2000No. 97-8659-BKC-3F7PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR GARNISHMENT AFTER JUDGMENT
JERRY A. FUNK, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Case is before the Court on a Motion for Garnishment after Judgment filed by First Coast Auto Finance, Inc. (“Mov-ant”) on January 10, 2000. (Doc. 69.) Movant seeks a continuing writ of garnishment on Morrison Pontiac, Inc. pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 69 made applicable to bankruptcy proceedings by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7069. Movant claims that Morrison Pontiac, Inc. may be indebted to Kevin M. Miller (“Debtor”) for wages and salary on a continuing basis. Upon review of this Motion, the Court makes the following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Continental National Bank of Miami v. Sanchez (In Re Toledo)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- 23 Collier bankr.cas.2d 999, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,616 in the Matter of Lemco Gypsum, Inc., Debtor. Lawrence E. Miller, Jr., Miller Resources, Inc. v. Kemira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Community Bank of Homestead v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re Arrowmill Development Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harpley v. Five Star Tickets, Inc. (In Re Premier Sports Tours)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Johnson v. LovatoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2021