Legal Opinion

Hynoski v. Columbia County Redevelopment Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 27, 2012No. 11-2861UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

The appellants brought this putative class action lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging, inter alia, that the appel-lees violated their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the course of condemning their property through eminent domain. On appeal, the appellants challenge the District Court’s refusal to grant a prelimi nary injunction that would have enjoined the appellees, or anyone acting on their behalf, from taking any action in furtherance of the eminent domain proceedings relating to the appellants’ property. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CARLA CAIN v. CINDY BASSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Davis v. PotterDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2024
  3. Loralyn Maixner v. Harold EidsnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
  4. Moses v. LakeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2023
  5. WILLOW STREET PROPERTIES, LLC v. BOROUGH OF WOOD-RIDGEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API